Jewish Rabbis recognize Serpent Seedline

as well as Sumerians, Targums and Biblical Accounts

There are several places where we find the account of Eve being seduced by the Serpent. There is the Biblical account which is discussed below and there are also accounts outside the Bible. Consider the following Excerpt from the late Willie Martin:

"There is very substantial evidence that the "Jews" of today are descended from Cain. We have no less than the words of Yeshua the Messiah Himself concerning this.

"Once it is understood the "Jews" are devils walking around in shoe leather, we can begin to see the guiding hand of the great world conspiracy and all the monstrous problems we are faced with today.

"Without an understanding of the Two Seedlines, we are at a detrimental loss to know who the enemy is. The knowledge, or the lack of it, is the difference between the brightest day or the blackest night. Because this verse is not properly understood is one of the reasons that Yahweh states in Hosea: "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge..." (Hosea 4:6) (KJV)

"So who benefits from this scriptural corruption, and where might you expect to find this Seedline doctrine taught? One Seedline teacher accurately pointed out that this hypothesis is not of modern origin: ‘ The historicity of a sexual interpretation of original sin can be documented from the literature of antiquity and clearly proves beyond any doubt that this belief did not originate with modern man.' (Scott Stinson, "The Serpent and Eve," The Vision (Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, July 1998, Volume 2 Number 8) p. 28)

"In other words, from Judahites who had been educated in Babylonian traditions. Among others, this seedliner quoted rabbis who quoted the Talmud as "proof" for his Seedline beliefs: ‘ (the Seedline hypothesis) was a common teaching among the (post‑Babylonian) rabbis of antiquity...In one place, we read: ‘ rabbi Johanan stated. When the serpent copulated with Eve, he infused her with lust.' (Yebamoth 103b) Another rabbi states: ‘ Thus I have learnt, that when the serpent had intercourse with Eve he injected defilement into her.' (Haye Sarah 126a) Lastly, another replies: ‘ You rightly said that when the serpent had carnal intercourse with Eve he injected into her defilement." (Haye Sarah 126b) (Scott Stinson, "The Serpent and Eve," The Vision (Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, July 1998, Volume 2 Number 8) p. 28)

Targums Account

We also find serpent seed accounts in the Targums: "This seedliner also quoted several other Babylonian‑influenced works of antiquity: “ This (Seedline) interpretation is confirmed in the ancient literature of Israel, especially the commentaries on the Hebrew Bible written in Aramaic and commonly known as Targums. The commentaries were written after the (remnant's, people from the Tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi) return from Babylon...One text gives this interpretation of Genesis 4:1: ‘ And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by the Angel Sammael, and she conceived and bare Cain; and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have acquired a man, the angel of the Lord." (Targum of Jonathan to Genesis 4:1)

"Another ancient commentary gives a similar interpretation of the same passage: ‘ And Adam knew his wife Eve, who had desired the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Cain; and she said, I have acquired a man, the angel of the Lord..." (Palestinian Targum to Genesis 4:1) In another rabbinic work we find a similar interpretation...And she saw that his likeness was not of earthly beings, but of the heavenly beings, and she prophesied and said: I have gotten a man from the Lord." (Pirke de Rabbi Elieser, 21) One Rabbinic source states: ‘ Eve bore Cain from the filth of the serpent, and therefore from him were descended all the wicked generations, and from his side is the abode of spirits and demons.' (Ahare Moth 76b) A similar explanation for the evil deeds of Cain's lineage is found elsewhere. We read: ‘ For two beings had intercourse with Eve, and she conceived from both and bore two children. Each followed one of the male parents, to this side and one to the other, and similarly their characters. On the side of Cain are all the haunts of the evil species, from which come evil spirit and demons." (Bereshith 36b) (Scott Stinson, "The Serpent and Eve," The Vision (Schell City, MO: The Church of Israel, July 1998, Volume 2 Number 8) p. 28‑29)

To read the entire text of Willie's Martin'exegis on the seedlines, see: 2 Seedlines.

Summerian Account

Even the Summerians had an ancient story similar to the serpent seed doctrine.

"Another possible genesis of the idea of a Luciferian bloodline may have come from the Elohim, who in the Bible say: "Let us make man in our image." Elohim is generally thought to be a plural of God, or to be "the gods." But it is also widely believed to be the Nephilim, the fallen angels known as the Watchers in the Book of Enoch. It is believed that the word Elohim comes from the much more ancient Babylonian word Ellu, which means "Shining Ones." This phrase has a distinctively Luciferian connotation, because the name Lucifer literally means "lightbearer." And the descendants of Cain, who were the deified kings of Sumeria, bore the title of Ari, a term which also meant "Shining Ones." The Sumerian pictogram for Ari (as noted in other articles this issue) is an inverted pentagram, a symbol long associated with Lucifer. And the phrase "Shining Ones" would be a very apt description for the descendants of Enoch’s fallen angels, who were said to have hair white as snow, pale eyes, and pale skin which seemed literally to glow and fill the room with light. The Sumerian Ari are almost always depicted as wearing crowns bearing horns, and some of their descendants were said actually to have had horns. "

The Biblical Account

The best account of the serpent seed doctrine is found in the very word of God:


1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God ['elohiym] said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Note that the serpent is an upright, talking being, not a snake that crawls on the ground.

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit

1) fruit (pariy): a) fruit, offspring, children, progeny (of the womb) b) fruit of actions (fig.)

of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God['elohiym] hath said, Ye shall not eat of it,

1) to eat (‘akal): devour (it is used not only of men but also of beasts, Isa 11:7; to enjoy any thing as good fortune, the fruit of good or evil actions, sexual pleasures, Pro. 30:20;

neither shall ye touch it,

1) touch (naga): euph. To lie with a woman

lest ye die. 4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 For God ['elohiym] doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods['elohiym], knowing good and evil. 6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

Why would they become aware of their nakedness and make aprons to hide their private parts if they had merely eaten a piece of fruit? The sexual implications are written all over these scriptures.

8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. 9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? 10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; [crafty, subtil] and I hid myself. 11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? 12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. 13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, 9 and I did eat.

1) beguile (nasha): to seduce

14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

This is not a transformation of the serpent into a snake. To "eat of the dust of the ground" is a figure of speech that means the serpent will be reduced to the lowest of degradation. This next verse is the verse that the term "Serpent Seed" is derived from.

15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed [the serpent's seed] and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel

1) seed (zera): semen virile, offspring

As one can readily see, Gen. 3:15 refers to the serpent's seed or offspring. This verse is referring to the death of Christ when the Jews bruise Christ's heels by succeeding in having Him nailed to the cross and where Christ then resurrects to bruise the head of the devil, i.e., destroy him.

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception;

1) conception (herown): physical conception, pregnancy

in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

GEN 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. 2 And she again

1) again (yacaph): to continue (Job 27:1, Job 29:1)

bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

God said He would MULTIPLY Eve's conception and in fact there were 2 conceptions, first from eating the fruit of the serpent and second from knowing Adam. There were 2 births. First Cain and then continuing in labor, Eve bore Abel. They were fraternal twins, meaning twins from two different fathers.

The KJV translates Gen 4:1 as Eve saying she had gotten a man "from the Lord", but I believe this verse should be translated as "against the Lord". See What Eve Said.

Finally in Chapter 5, the Genealogy of Adam, you will not find Cain mentioned in Adam's Genealogy. Abel wasn't mentioned either but he wouldn't be since he was murdered and had no offspring. Cain's genealogy is mentioned extensively in Gen. 4:17-end.